Quash
8.3

Quash

  • Ship mobile apps faster without breaking your QA cycle
  • AI-powered mobile testing built for real device coverage

Quash Key Insights

Pricing Model: Subscription
Free Tier: 14 day free trial  
Marked As: AI Mobile Testing and QA Automation Platform
Price: From $79/month
Natural language test generation:
Self healing test execution:
Cloud device testing:
Real device fleet:
Local emulator support:
Backend and API validation:
Database validation:
CI CD integration:
Codebase and Figma test generation:
Bring your own LLM keys:
SSO and SCIM provisioning:
On prem or self hosted deployment:

What is Quash?

Quash

Quash is an AI powered mobile testing platform that generates and runs QA test cases from plain English prompts rather than requiring engineers to write scripts or define UI selectors. It targets QA teams, mobile developers and product managers who need functional and visual coverage across Android, iOS, Flutter and React Native apps without the usual scripting overhead.

The platform executes on real devices, cloud devices or local emulators and includes self healing test logic that adapts automatically when screens, loading states or UI elements shift between builds. For a business this means fewer maintenance hours spent fixing failed test scripts after every release and faster QA cycles that keep pace with development. Detailed execution reports with screenshots and root cause context also help non technical stakeholders review results without pulling in engineering support.

Key Features of Quash
Intent Driven Test Execution
Test Execution Quash

Testers describe a flow such as opening an app and completing a purchase, and Quash converts that intent into actual taps, swipes and form interactions on the device. This removes the need to hard code selectors, which is usually the biggest source of test breakage in traditional frameworks.

Self Healing Adaptation

When an app update changes a button position or adds a new loading screen, Quash adjusts execution on the fly instead of failing the run. Teams shipping weekly or biweekly releases benefit most since regression suites stay usable without constant rework.

Backend and API Validation In The Same Run
API Validation Quash

Quash checks backend responses and database behaviour during the same mobile test execution rather than as a separate pass. This catches issues that only show up when the UI looks fine but the data behind it is wrong.

Multi Platform Device Coverage
Multi Platform Device Coverage Quash

Tests run across Android, iOS, Flutter and React Native on physical devices, emulators or cloud hosted device farms with no separate infrastructure to manage. This suits teams supporting several OS versions at once without buying a device lab.

Quash Pricing Plans

Plan NameCostTest MinutesApps IncludedConcurrent SessionsNotable Features
Free Trial$0100 one time11Local devices and emulators only
Starter$79/month80011Cloud devices, backend validation
Growth$319/month350023CI CD integration
Pro$719/month900046Unlimited users, scheduled regression runs
EnterpriseCustom pricingUnlimitedUnlimitedCustomDedicated device fleet, custom LLM keys, SSO and SCIM

Team Collaboration and Access Control

Quash includes role based access control across all paid tiers so admins can separate who builds tests from who only views reports. Higher tiers add unlimited seats and priority support, which matters once a QA function grows past a single tester managing everything alone. Admins can also organise test suites by app or by team, so a fintech client and an ecommerce client running separate mobile builds do not end up mixing regression paths or reports. 

This structure suits agencies and larger product teams where developers, QA leads and product managers all need different levels of visibility without stepping on each other's work. As headcount grows, the ability to add seats without extra per user fees on Pro and Enterprise keeps the cost predictable compared with platforms that charge per licence.

Reporting and Debugging Depth

Every run generates a report with step level intent, screenshots, network data and AI written summaries of failures. This gives product managers and developers enough context to fix an issue without asking the tester to reproduce it manually. Reports also capture the exact device state and network conditions at the point of failure, which removes the usual back and forth between QA and engineering over whether a bug is device specific or environment specific. 

Because backend and API data sits alongside the UI trace in the same report, a developer can often pinpoint whether a failure came from the frontend or the server without opening a second tool. This level of detail cuts the time spent on bug triage, which is usually one of the slower parts of a mobile release cycle.

Pros and Cons

Pros
  • No scripting required for tests.
  • Self healing reduces maintenance work.
  • Backend and UI checks in one run.
  • Works across major mobile frameworks.
  • Free trial with no card upfront.
Cons
  • Higher tiers get expensive fast.
  • On prem hosting not on standard plans.

Best Quash Alternatives

AI Mobile Testing and QA Automation PlatformScripting RequirementBackend Validation
AppiumFull coding requiredNot built in
BrowserStack App AutomateScript based with some AI aidLimited
Katalon StudioLow code with scripting optionLimited
Verdict: Quash wins on true scriptless setup paired with backend checks in a single run.

  • Describe a test in plain English. Quash runs it on real devices.
  • $79/month
  • No scripts. No locators. Just real device results.
8.0
Platform Security
9.0
Risk-Free & Money-Back
9.0
Services & Features
7.0
Customer Service
8.3 Overall Rating

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Quash
8.3/10
© Copyright 2023 - 2026 | Become an AI Pro | Made with ♥